Digital Audio Insider -- blogging the economics of digital music

home

about
Digital Audio Insider is David Harrell's blog about the economics of digital music.

contact
Follow the advice of a certain Scottish band to send an e-mail.

links

music business/tech:
Ad-Supported Music Central
Analog Industries
Ars Technica
Apple 2.0
AppleInsider
Brad Sucks Blog
Broken Record
Byte of the Apple
CNET Music News
Coolfer
Digital Music News
Digital Noise
Duke Listens
Epicenter
Future of Music Coalition Blog
Hypebot
Know the Music Biz
LA Times Technology Blog
The ListeNerd
Medialoper
MP3 Insider
Music Ally
Music Machinery
Music Think Tank
MusicTank
New Music Strategies
Online Fandom
Pampelmoose
Penny Distribution Blog
RAIN
Rough Type
Swindleeeee
TuneTuzer

economics/markets:
The Big Picture
Core Economics
Freakonomics
The Long Tail
Marginal Revolution
Odd Numbers
Partially Unexpected
The Undercover Economist

mp3/music:
17 Dots
3hive
Fingertips
Shake Your Fist

archives
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008
October 2008
November 2008
December 2008
January 2009
February 2009
March 2009
April 2009
May 2009
June 2009
July 2009

October 04, 2007

Economists, Radiohead, and Bob Mould
by David Harrell

Lots of folks have lots to say about the forthcoming "name your own price" digital album download from Radiohead. I was especially interested in seeing the reaction from some of the economics blogs I read:

Marginal Revolution - Pay what you want for the new Radiohead album

Greg Mankiw's Blog - No, really, it's up to you

Freakonomics - How Much Do You Think Paul Feldman Will Pay for the New Radiohead Album?

Asymmetrical Information - Radiohead goes free

While the economists (and other commentators) are mostly referring to the Radiohead experiment as "working for tips," I don't quite agree with the analogy. The tipping description would be more appropriate if Radiohead simply posted all of the mp3 files on its website, with an adjacent "donate" button for soliciting contributions from downloaders.

They haven't done this -- you have to order the album and pay SOMETHING, even if just the modest service charge for processing the credit card. While this distinction might seem slight, I'd argue that it is an extremely important one. The online ordering process requires you to open your wallet, and -- while you're still free to make a minimal payment -- it seems like this is THE crucial step. A donation approach requires the downloader to actively make an additional decision, perhaps at a later date, to enter a credit card number, etc.

On the other hand, if you insist on the tipping description, it's really not that much of a stretch to say that ALL music is purchased that way today. That is, given that free alternatives are readily available (P2P networks, ripping CDs from friends, swamping hard drives, etc.), any decision by a music fan to purchase music in any format, downloads or physical discs, represents a conscious decision to "tip" the musician and record label. (The Economist blog makes this point as well, referring to the current system an "honour system.") Though there's much less price flexibility with a standard purchase than there is with the Radiohead model.

While musician Bob Mould won't be heading down the Radiohead path for his next album (he's signed to Anti- and Beggers Banquet), he conducted an online survey on the topic, asking readers what they'd prefer to pay for direct downloads from the artist.

I was a little surprised by the price points that Mould used for his survey -- $1 or $2 for an individual song, $10 or $20 for a full album, as well as larger amounts for subscription model to receive all of an artist's work. In a follow-up post showing the poll results, he talks about the idea of some music fans being willing to pay more for a record because they know all the money is going to the artist (only a small percentage of responders indicated a willingness to do so). Yet if you're paying the artist directly, the standard download rates ($1 a song or $10 an album) is actually putting substantially more revenue into the hands of the artist as there's no record company keeping the bulk of the money. (And my personal contention is that a digital album -- because of the lack of artwork, the loss of resale value, and lower sound quality -- is worth substantially less than a physical CD. The eMusic album price of $2.50 to $3 seems just about right to me, especially if the majority of that amount goes directly to the artist. Though maybe I'm just exceptionally cheap!)

However, Mould's idea of higher music prices in certain cases makes more sense in the context of something that economist Tyler Cowen wrote in Good and Plenty and posted last week on Marginal Revolution. It was an observation that I don't think I've seen before about downloading and music sales:

In the past most people didn't much like or listen to most of the music they bought, or in any case most of the value came from their very favorites. A relatively small percentage of our music purchases accounted for most of our listening pleasure. So if people can sample music in advance, and know in advance what they will like, music sales will plummet. This will be a sign of market efficiency, not market failure.

Perhaps Cowen is right and people on average are just buying less music, as a smaller dollar amount now suffices for purchasing a sufficient amount of music they like. Yet if his "sampling" theory is correct, there are a couple of other possible results:

1. Music fans use the money they've saved by not making purchasing mistakes to buy a greater quantity/variety of music they actually like.

2. Music fans use the money they've saved to pay MORE for the music they really like.

Based on plummeting CD sales, if the two alternative scenarios are taking place, it's only among a minority of music buyers. Still, based on some of the amounts I've seen in blog comments over the past few days about the new Radiohead album, at least a few fans are readily paying up for the album (as are some of Jane Siberry's fans).

And maybe that's not illogical. After all, the music you really love, your personal collection of desert island discs, is a relative bargain at the standard prices. There are certainly albums and artists that I value far above the purchase price of the recorded music.

Whether a substantial number of fans are willing -- in practice, not theory -- to pay a premium price for an individual song or album is the unanswered question. It seems like the biggest fans are already "paying more" to artists via the purchase of tickets to live shows, merchandise, and a willingness to re-purchase music again and again in re-mastered and enhanced formats. Is also asking for (or expecting) a premium price from these buyers going too far? (BTW, just to be clear, I don't mean to suggest that Bob Mould expects a premium price from his audience.)

Anyway, in his Freakonomics post, Steven Levitt put out the call for someone to get him in contact with Radiohead to possibly analyze the actual sales data. I hope someone does -- it'd be fascinating to see his take on the real numbers.

tags: digital music Radiohead economists Bob Mould

link 5 comments e-mail this post Digg this post follow DAI on Twitter

Subscribe:

RSS Feed

Add this blog to Del.icio.us, Digg or Furl

The Digital Audio Insider Twitter feed:

Looking to hire? Looking for a job? Check out the digital audio insider job board.

The Layaways (my band)

New album: "The Space Between" is now available from eMusic.

"It can't be easy to make something this basically simple sound so fulfilling; it if were, everyone would do it." -- Fingertips

"The Layaways have a unique sound with great drum fills and airy vocals that will make you tap your feet and sing along." -- VIC Radio

Keep It to Yourself - free mp3
All Around the World - free mp3
Come Back Home - free mp3

Download from eMusic, iTunes, Amazon MP3, Lala.com, or CD Baby, listen to free streams at Last.fm and Napster.

"The Layaways make fine indie pop. Hushed vocals interweave with understated buzzing guitars. The whole LP is a revelation from the start." -- Lost Music

"A wonderfully crafted recording built around tasteful songwriting and musicianship..." -- PopMatters

Silence - free mp3
The Long Night - free mp3

Download from eMusic, Amazon MP3, or iTunes, listen to free streams at Last.fm, Napster, or Rhapsody.

"These are songs that you want to take home with you, curl up with, hold them close -- and pray that they are still with you when you wake up." -- The Big Takeover

Let Me In - free mp3
Ocean Blue - free mp3

Download from eMusic, Amazon MP3, or iTunes, listen to free streams at Last.fm, Napster, or Rhapsody.

More Layaways downloads:

the layaways website

Current/Recent Reading and Listening:

Music Supervision: The Complete Guide to Selecting Music for Movies, TV, Games and New Media by Ramsay Adams, David Hnatiuk, and David Weiss

It's written as a how-to guide for those looking to become music supervisors, but I found it to be a good resource for musicians (like me) who are trying to get their music used in movies, TV, etc.